Throughout history it has been almost axiomatic that a nation seeking to avoid subjection to a foreign overlord must itself achieve and exercise the powers of an overlord, and will succeed in doing so only by having at its disposal substantial military capabilities—and using them. One must rule or be ruled; there is no middle course.
(Trevor Bryce: Life and Society in the Hittite World)
Altruism—benefiting fellow group members at a cost to oneself—and parochialism—hostility toward individuals not of one's own ethnic, racial, or other group—are common human behaviors. [...] Our game-theoretic analysis and agent-based simulations show that under conditions likely to have been experienced by late Pleistocene and early Holocene humans, neither parochialism nor altruism would have been viable singly, but by promoting group conflict, they could have evolved jointly.
(a scientific paper quoted in this post at Dienekes' Anthropology Blog)
Once we see that our moral beliefs are simply an adaptation put in place by natural selection, that is an end to it. Morality is no more than a collective illusion fobbed off on us by our genes for reproductive ends.
Each of the quotes is unsettling enough by itself, when taken together the picture becomes almost unbearably grim. Not only war is an inescapable evil but, ironically, our nobler instincts are mere byproducts of it, arrived at through a blind process of natural selection that has nothing to do with any kind of objective moral facts, which indeed may not exist.
On the other hand, consider puppies. Puppies are cute.
No comments:
Post a Comment